Taylor Stukes

Associate
Charlotte, North Carolina
Greensboro, North Carolina
(T) 704.338.5316
(F) 704.805.4717
%7C%2CN%7D%24%3F%7BWHm1Mm%27Jz.%3F%7CE%3Dw%26
vCard

Practices
Practices

Taylor Stukes concentrates his practice in the areas of complex civil litigation,  serious tort claims, construction litigation, trucking industry defense, insurance coverage disputes, and medical malpractice defense.  Mr. Stukes is experienced in representing clients in state and federal courts.

Mr. Stukes earned his J.D. from the University of North Carolina School of Law where he served on the Editorial Board of the North Carolina Law Review as a Comments Editor.  He earned his B.A. degree in Political Science, with distinction, from the University of North Carolina.

Published Works:

On May 19, 2010, Jim Bryan and Taylor Stukes filed an amicus curiae brief in a case pending before the North Carolina Supreme Court on behalf of the Trucking Industry Defense Association.  Read more here.

Representative Matters

Successfully defended financial institution against claims of negligence and breach of contract from initial pleadings through the trial by jury

News
News

Publications
Publications
  • Amicus Curiae Brief Filed In Support of Liability Insurer on Definition of "Insured"
    On May 19, 2010, Jim Bryan and Taylor Stukes filed an amicus curiae brief in a case pending before the North Carolina Supreme Court on behalf of the Trucking Industry Defense Association. The Brief supported the position of Canal Insurance Company. Bryan and Stukes argued in their brief that the North Carolina Court of Appeals wrongly upheld a trial court’s interpretation of a provision in a trucking company’s insurance policy that defined who was an “insured” under the policy and had coverage. Judge Steelman of the Court of Appeals wrote a dissenting opinion.
  • Amicus Curiae Brief for Trucking Industry Defense Association
    On May 19, 2010, Jim Bryan and Taylor Stukes filed an amicus curiae brief in a case pending before the North Carolina Supreme Court on behalf of the Trucking Industry Defense Association. The Brief supported the position of Canal Insurance Company. Bryan and Stukes argued in their brief that the North Carolina Court of Appeals wrongly upheld a trial court’s interpretation of a provision in a trucking company’s insurance policy that defined who was an “insured” under the policy and had coverage. Judge Steelman of the Court of Appeals wrote a dissenting opinion.
  • Defenses for Cargo Loss Claims Under the Carmack Amendment
    Cargo travels this nation by truck through hundreds of miles and through the hands of multiple parties before it reaches its destination. During the journey, the parties involved in the transport of the cargo face constant risks for legal liability for damage or loss of cargo.
  • In re Wachovia Shareholder Litigation: The Case for the Common Benefit Doctrine, 84 N.C. L. Rev. 2066 (2006)

Events
Events
Education
Education
  • University of North Carolina, B.A., with distinction, 2004
  • University of North Carolina, J.D., 2007
Bar & Court Admissions
Bar & Court Admissions
  • North Carolina
  • U.S. District Court Western District of North Carolina
  • U.S. District Court Middle District of North Carolina
  • U.S. District Court Eastern District of North Carolina