WPC! x6D ' jĪ-LO a")[rZDžT!ƅáu?ħn0v8bxx[;H'LxuesmLNb+GA 4e^b)D:8&, 8*Zan7""یk=棄d.c}zzsޜ.襫Aj;fT.X8;1Dpܠ6 kH&@Nj  Йt5Ԭ`Q9"8氋 CHIO0R @ t9(i~qw'" 5Zd0;=@t=~Pt9V9+)K,듗ċ?:}U^76_ ::l :GP3ƑTϼY*$g)OȀߨOG{PmDwGiȋ^$g5#UN % 0R 0M 0; 0& 0 0 0 0 0 0i 0? 0 0 0 0 0m 0: 0 0 0 0j 0B 0 0 0 0 0M 0^ w4  m U6"NXZ 0n<U: 0 NU42 2 2 2 Zf p p0!!Toni 40000(uH Z6Times New Roman RegularX(*$  USUS.,  2G+J 0_level1  X /%4 4 <DL/23  ..  2( 4 <DL2  2D+J 0_level2   ," <DL,23  ..  2( 4 <DL2  2A+J 0_level3   ) <DL)23  ..  2( 4 <DL2  2>+J 0_level4  ` &<<DL&23  ..  2( 4 <DL2  2;+J 0_level5   #DL#23  ..  2( 4 <DL2  28+J 0_level6    DL 23  ..  2( 4 <DL2  25+J 0_level7  h DDL23  ..  2( 4 <DL2  22+J 0_level8   L23  ..  2( 4 <DL2  2/+J 0_level9    L23  ..  2( 4 <DL2  2GJ 0_levsl1  X /%4 4 <DL/23  Ԁ  2( 4 <DL2  2DJ 0_levsl2   ," <DL,23  Ԁ  2( 4 <DL2  2AJ 0_levsl3   ) <DL)23  Ԁ  2( 4 <DL2  2>J 0_levsl4  ` &<<DL&23  Ԁ  2( 4 <DL2  2;J 0_levsl5   #DL#23  Ԁ  2( 4 <DL2  28J 0_levsl6    DL 23  Ԁ  2( 4 <DL2  25J 0_levsl7  h DDL23  Ԁ  2( 4 <DL2  22J 0_levsl8   L23  Ԁ  2( 4 <DL2  2/J 0_levsl9    L23  Ԁ  2( 4 <DL2  2GJ 0_levnl1  X /%4 4 <DL/23   2( 4 <DL2  2DJ 0_levnl2   ," <DL,23   2( 4 <DL2  2AJ 0_levnl3   ) <DL)23   2( 4 <DL2  2>J 0_levnl4  ` &<<DL&23   2( 4 <DL2  2;J 0_levnl5   #DL#23   2( 4 <DL2  28J 0_levnl6    DL 23   2( 4 <DL2  25J 0_levnl7  h DDL23   2( 4 <DL2  22J 0_levnl8   L23   2( 4 <DL2  2/J 0_levnl9    L23   2( 4 <DL2  ӭ* ("3|xU,@F*ZCharter BT  )Q*  USUS.,  _  *XXXX*^\X*XNPCOL1:497959.1MM(_WTL_)00013500060(F3Q$ !  USUS.,   ,yAZ"Arial Regular(O$*jp*`Charter BThttp://laws.findlaw.com/us/000/99-1908.html http://lawlibrary.rutgers.edu/fed/html/ca01-702-2.html http://lawlibrary.rutgers.edu/fed/html/ca01-702-3.html www.npjp.com !  USUS.,   __(_  &XuMXXX@: : RecentSignificantEnvironmentalJusticeDecisions    AnApril19,2001ruling,afederaldistrictcourtjudgesuspendedforthirty(30)days,  apermitforanewcementfacilitybaseduponviolationsofTitleVIoftheCivilRightsAct.  ThejudgecitedfailureoftheNewJerseyDepartmentofEnvironmentalProtectionto p considerthecumulativeenvironmentalburdenalreadybornebythisimpoverished `  communityandtheracialandethniccompositionofthepopulation.Therulingisthefirst P  toactuallyoverturnanenvironmentalpermitonenvironmentaljusticeclaims.The @  company'soptionsareunclearatthistime,giventhefactthattherulingisagainstthestate 0  permittingauthorityandnottheoperatingfacility.42 ,O  5  (SouthCamdenCitizensinActionv.New  p  JerseyDepartmentofEnvironmentalProtection6I,O]  7 >,_D.N.J._,No.01702,4/19/01). d    Lessthanaweeklater,theU.S.SupremeCourtruledthatprivatepartiescannotsue H  statestopreventviolationsoffederaldisparateimpactregulationsunderTitleVIoftheCivil 8  RightsAct.IntheApril24,2001ruling,the54highcourtimmediatelyinvalidatedthe (  SouthCamdendecisionandtookawayoneofthekeyweaponsthatprivatepartiesuseto  bringactionsagainststateauthoritiesforpermittingdecisionstheysaidbrought   disproportionateenvironmentalimpactonlowincomeorminorityAmericans.Inadecision  writtenbyJustice_Antonin_ԀScalia,thecourtruledthatonlyfederalagenciesmaysuestates  fordisparateimpact.PrivatecitizensmaysuestatesonlyunderSection601ofthecivil  rightslaw,whichrequirespartiestoshowintentionaldiscrimination,notjustthe | discriminatoryeffectsofastateaction,thecourtheld.(41 0,O  5  Alexanderv._Sandoval6 ,O   7 `9 _,U.S.,No.99 l 1908,4/24/01). ` -XuMXX&XuM  InspiteoftherecentSupremeCourtrulingin#&XuMXX-XuM #-XuMXX&XuMAlexanderv._Sandoval_#&XuMXX-XuM #-XuMXX&XuM,theresidentsof @ SouthCamden,N.J.,cancontinuetoasserttheirdisparateimpactclaimsagainststate 4 regulatorswhoissuedanairpollutionpermitforafacilityintheirneighborhood,theU.S. $t DistrictCourtfortheDistrictofNewJerseyruledMay10.Thecourtsaidthatacivilrights d actionunder42U.S.C.1983isanappropriatevehicleforprivateindividualstoenforce T regulationsfederalagenciesissuedtoimplementTitleVIofthe1964CivilRightsAct.The D districtcourtacknowledgedtheU.S.SupremeCourt'sApril24rulingin#&XuMXX-XuM #-XuMXX&XuMAlexanderv._Stoval_#&XuMXX-XuM#-XuMXX&XuM,  4 69_U.S.L.W._Ԁ4250(U.S.2001),whichfoundTitleVIprovidesnoprivaterightofactionto !( enforcethedisparateimpactregulations,butfoundthehighcourt'sdecisiondoesnot "  forecloseaSection1983actiontoachievethesameend.43 %,O  5  (#&XuMXX-XuMw#-XuMXX&XuMSouthCamdenCitizensinAction #! v.NewJerseyDepartmentofEnvironmentalProtection6,O  7 !#&XuMXX-XuMR#-XuMXX&XuM,_D.N.J._,No.01-802,5/10/01)#&XuMXX-XuMX# $"   Thefirmhasobtainedacopyofthedecisions(in._pdf_Ԁformat)whichcanbefound &!$ onourWebsiteat44  ,O  5  www.NPJP.com6,O  7 xorbyrequestingacopyfromoneofourEnvironmental '"% PracticeGroupattorneysat803/771-8900.